Resolving Power in SPcAudace
Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2020 7:06 pm
Hi all,
I've been looking for a cause of the lower resolution, given to me by SPcAudace . I have therefore compared the spectra of about a year ago with the spectra of my calibration lamp that I record today. According to the software, the resolution is about 9200 ... 9800 with my LHiResIII and 2400 l/mm grating for the spectra I treat today. Last year I had at least 13,000 and higher to more than 15.000 for the same setup.
So I analyzed the calibration spectra with BASS software. On the Ne-lines I easily reach 13.400 and more, while SPcAudace shows more around 9200 in the report for BeSS database).
I suspect that somewhere a setting in SPcAudace determines on which Ne-peak the resolution is measured. I checked the FITS header and i see under keyword:
SPC_RESL = 6532.8804646999997 [angstrom] Wavelength for resolution measuremen angstrom
SPC_RESP = 9475 Power of resolution at wavelength SPC_RESL
The same spectrum in BASS gives me:
FWHM : 0.494995Å (R = 13195 @6531.65Å) 5.31805px
I've now done another test with an older spectrum. The Ne-line with BASS software gives a resolution of 12767, while SPcAudace gives about 6373 (in Bess report window) for identical spectrum and Ne-line of 6532.88 Angstrom.
Something is not right here. Any ideas ?
thanking in advance !
best regards
Erik
I've been looking for a cause of the lower resolution, given to me by SPcAudace . I have therefore compared the spectra of about a year ago with the spectra of my calibration lamp that I record today. According to the software, the resolution is about 9200 ... 9800 with my LHiResIII and 2400 l/mm grating for the spectra I treat today. Last year I had at least 13,000 and higher to more than 15.000 for the same setup.
So I analyzed the calibration spectra with BASS software. On the Ne-lines I easily reach 13.400 and more, while SPcAudace shows more around 9200 in the report for BeSS database).
I suspect that somewhere a setting in SPcAudace determines on which Ne-peak the resolution is measured. I checked the FITS header and i see under keyword:
SPC_RESL = 6532.8804646999997 [angstrom] Wavelength for resolution measuremen angstrom
SPC_RESP = 9475 Power of resolution at wavelength SPC_RESL
The same spectrum in BASS gives me:
FWHM : 0.494995Å (R = 13195 @6531.65Å) 5.31805px
I've now done another test with an older spectrum. The Ne-line with BASS software gives a resolution of 12767, while SPcAudace gives about 6373 (in Bess report window) for identical spectrum and Ne-line of 6532.88 Angstrom.
Something is not right here. Any ideas ?
thanking in advance !
best regards
Erik