Question about binning
Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2020 8:30 am
Hi all
I have just bought a new camera to go on my LHIRES. I was using a SBIG ST8XME with 9um pixels and it has worked very well. I use a 35um slit mostly. It has just started to become a little unreliable so I purchased a ASI294MM. The QE is very good which is why I bought the new camera. It has a Sony IMX294 with 14 bit ADC. They achieve this by binning 2x2 in the camera. The end result is pixels that are 4.63um.
This is about 1/2 the size of what I was using with the ST8.
I know that binning CMOS cameras doesn't achieve any real noise reduction but it does result in much lower file size. Unbinned each file is 22meg and ISIS turns them into 45meg files when processed. This is compared to 1.5meg files with the ST8. I will fill the hard drive of my observatory computer pretty quickly.
Is there any advantage to using the CMOS camera at it's full resolution?
cheers
Terry
I have just bought a new camera to go on my LHIRES. I was using a SBIG ST8XME with 9um pixels and it has worked very well. I use a 35um slit mostly. It has just started to become a little unreliable so I purchased a ASI294MM. The QE is very good which is why I bought the new camera. It has a Sony IMX294 with 14 bit ADC. They achieve this by binning 2x2 in the camera. The end result is pixels that are 4.63um.
This is about 1/2 the size of what I was using with the ST8.
I know that binning CMOS cameras doesn't achieve any real noise reduction but it does result in much lower file size. Unbinned each file is 22meg and ISIS turns them into 45meg files when processed. This is compared to 1.5meg files with the ST8. I will fill the hard drive of my observatory computer pretty quickly.
Is there any advantage to using the CMOS camera at it's full resolution?
cheers
Terry